Copyright infringement Essay - 2649 Words

Copyright infringement In general terms, copyright provides an author with a tool to protect a work from being taken, used, and exploited by others without permission (Roseoner 1). This is further defined in federal statute 17 U.S.C. Section 106. The owner of the copyrighted work has the exclusive right to authorize any of the following: - to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies - to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work - to distribute copies of the copyrighted work to the public - to display the copyrighted work in a public setting There have been many underlying forces that have shaped the copyright law in our legal system today. Tensions have always existed between the rights of the public versus†¦show more content†¦He is essentially a preacher and moralist, but a preacher from the stage of life, with the spirit of the dramatist in the series of scenes with which he often addressed his audience (Hind 233). Hogarth was constantly preyed upon by plagiarists. Hogarth’s most popular work was called The Rake’s Progress, which were a collection of prints. Plagiarists would actually pose as potential buyers to get into Hogarth’s home to see his most popular works, then they would make attempts at reproducing the images of what they had seen. By 1735, England granted Hogarth’s protection claims. The copyright laws of the United States stand on this structure built in England. In 1790, the United States Congress enacted our first federal copyright statute providing copyright for an initial term of 14 years. In 1831, the initial term of copyright was lengthened to 28 years. By 1870, the laws were amended to cover paintings, drawings, statues and models or designs of works of the fine arts. Recent legislation has extended the term to the artist’s life plus 70 years for works created after 1977. For works created before 1978 that must be renewed, the total term has been extended to 95 years from the time it was published. There has been a dispute as to what constitutes publication, and interpretations have ranged from an appearance in an exhibition to reproduction in printed form. The law varies from country to country. Today, we have the Internet. In 1995, there wasShow MoreRelatedCopyright Infringement is Immoral1165 Words   |  5 Pagesmusic without paying for it is so easy it barely seems illegal. Copyright infringement is a huge ethical issue going on right now. From downloading movies and music from peer-to-peer programs as well as various websites to being able to stream a movie at the click of a button without a copy ever being saved on the computer its so simple, anyone could get addicted to doing it. For some of these reasons many argue that copyright infringement is a moral thing to do, but on the other hand others believeRead MoreThe Infringement Of The Copyright Infringement761 Words   |  4 Pages1) Does that forwarding email institute for copyright infringement: The copyright in an email is determined by its content. Forwarding emails is generally not considered to be a breach of copyright, but, one should carefully consider the nature of the content of the email and whether it is appropriate to forward it, as other legal issues, such as privacy and confidentiality, also apply. According to Copyright Act, it considers sending emails as an act of communication, although, the issue with emailsRead MoreCopyright And Copyright Infringement Trials2263 Words   |  10 Pagesbooks, etc. Many people protect their intellectual by copyrighting their work. Copyrights are trademarks or patents, and give the owners of the work the right to claim their work and protect it from theft. Use or reference of famous work is permitted when it is for â€Å"transformative† or limited use. This work be considered â€Å"fair use† and many copyright infringement trials have been dismissed because of this. Copyrights are an important tool to ensure that copyrighted work that is referenced mentionsRead MoreCopyright Infringement Research Paper4022 Words   |  17 PagesCopyright Infringement Research Paper We are well into the year of 2011 and technology is continuing to advance and a faster and faster rate. As technology advances there continues to be more of an opportunity for things to go wrong. The ability of our society to obtain information has been becoming as easy as it has ever been. I simple line into the google search bar and you are looking at millions upon millions of lings and opportunities to attain information. With this source and hundredsRead MorePatents And Copyright Infringement Trials1971 Words   |  8 Pagestheir intellectual properties through copyrighting it. Copyrights are patents and trademarks, and it gives the owners the right to claim their work and protect it from theft (Intellectial Property Help Desk). Use or reference of famous work is permitted whenn it is transformative or for limited use. This work is considered fair use and many copyright infringement trials have been dismissed because of the fair use doctrine. Copyrights are an important tool to ensure that copyrighted work thatRead MoreNapster : The Problem Of Copyright Infringement981 Words   |  4 Pages Napster had the attention of the Record Industry Association of America (RIAA), and their concerns of Copyright infringement. About a year after its launch, it was sued by the RIAA, which represented major recording companies such as Universal Music, BMG, Sony Music, and Warner Music Group. They claimed that by allowing users to swap free music recordings, Napster’s service violated Copyright laws. Eventually, the judge ruled against Napster forcing them to shut down operations and liquidate itsRead MoreThe Violation Of Copyright Infringement1296 Words   |  6 PagesOn the 26th of June, 2015 the Copyright (Online Infringement) amendment was assented, and came into effect the day after. The laws that this amendment includes aim to allow copyright holders to make requests that online locations hosting their copyrighted content be blocked, regardless of if the websites are hosted on Australian soil or not. The amendment also allows copyright holders to request that the details of piraters be handed over by Internet Service Providers. However, the effectivenessRead MoreOwnership And Infringement Of Copyrights2189 Words   |  9 PagesOwnership and Infringement of Copyrights Introduction: Definition and understanding of Copyrights: The legal right that is created by enforcement of law by a country that provides the creator of an original exclusive work rights to use and distribute it, usually for a limited time with the aim of enabling the initiator to get compensation for their intellect work is known as copyright. It is a structure of intellectual property such as trademark, a patent or trade secret etc which is relevant toRead MoreCopyright Infringement Essay788 Words   |  4 PagesCopyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material in a manner that violates one of the copyright owners exclusive rights, such as the right to reproduce or perform the copyrighted work, or to make derivative works that build upon it. For electronic and audio-visual media, unauthorized reproduction and distribution is often referred to as piracy (however there is no legal basis for this and indeed in one US copyright lawsuit the judge ordered the plaintiffs legal team to stopRead MoreThe Government s Combat On Copyrights Infringement2844 Words   |  12 PagesAgreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Copyright protection is one area that China has made great progress in especially in the entertainment industry. With China’s economy booming, China is consuming an increasing amount of TV shows. However, China’s TV industry suffers from a critical dilemma-the lack of innovations. This research paper will study in depth how the government’s combat on copyrights infringement affect the amount of innovations in the TV industry in China.

Moral or Immoral free essay sample

Moral or Immoral Should people have the power to act as God? Should scientific studies be limited? Some people would say yes, while others would say no. There are countless debates that are constantly going on in the biological field. Two examples of these highly debated topics are stem cell research and euthanasia. In the U. S. today, many people are questioning the morality of stem cell research and euthanasia. Stem cells are cells that can renew themselves. They have the ability of making an organism regenerate its tissue. Many people disagree with stem cell research because it involves the human embryo, therapeutic cloning, and preimplantation. To initiate the creation of a stem cell, the procedure requires the use of one of these two options. Scientists can either choose to terminate a human embryo, or use a process called therapeutic cloning. This has led to a disagreement in the U. S. today. Many people argue that a human embryo is a life and deserves to live. These people are for the â€Å"pro-life movement† as opposed to the supporters of stem cell research who are for the â€Å"pro-choice movement. Stem cell research supporters argue that this research can have great medical value. Therapeutic cloning is when the human embryo is grown for fourteen days. After the fourteen days pass, its stem cells are removed and used to develop an organ. It does this by growing with a human tissue or organ. Using its stem cells, it can convert into an organ or a piece of human tissue that could be trans planted into a person. This is not complete termination of the embryo, but many can argue that the embryo is not fulfilling its â€Å"destiny† by growing into another human being. However, there is another option that could suit both sides of the argument, a process called preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is a procedure that is performed on embryos before the implantation. According to Princeton University, implantation is the natural process in which a fertilized egg becomes implanted in the lining of the uterus of placental mammals. Tests using embryonic screening can create a line of stem cells without developing the actual embryo. Lately, stem cell research has been very successful; however, many disputes are still being held on the morality of the issue. The termination of a human embryo, therapeutic cloning and preimplantation are all possible procedures that can lead to medical breakthroughs; however there are other controversies besides stem cell research. Euthanasia is defined as the taking of a life, either by the request of the patient, the patients family, or for the patient’s benefit as determined by others who are empowered to make that decision. Voluntary euthanasia is a terminally ill patients decision to spare them great pain and agony. Non-Voluntary euthanasia is when a patient has not given any permission or consent. Intentional euthanasia occurs when a patient is killed through euthanasia by action, or euthanasia by omission. Euthanasia by action is when a patient is killed by lethal injection. Euthanasia by omission is when a patient is intentionally not given the essential nutrients the body needs to survive. Euthanasia brings up questions for many people. Oregon and Washington are the only states in the U. S. where euthanasia is legal. Lawmakers in other states have avoided allowing euthanasia because there is concern of patient abuse. Supporters of euthanasia insist that the government is allowing inhumane suffering by not permitting euthanasia. However, the laws are still in place to protect the patient who has not, or cannot, make their requests clear. Stem cell research and euthanasia are only two of the many topics being disputed between pro-life and pro-choice activists. The question of what is right and what is wrong can only be answered to a certain degree. Stem cell research can lead to a medical breakthrough, but many people are saying its just wrong to disturb human DNA. Euthanasia supporters are begging for change, while the lawmakers stand their ground with the law. Morals will always be a suitable question as biological advancements are made.